<rss
      xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
      xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
      xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
      xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
      xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
      version="2.0"
    >
      <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Vitor Pamplona]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[Nostr's Chief Android Officer - #Amethyst]]></description>
        <link>https://vitor.npub.pro/tag/issuecomment-1646858226/</link>
        <atom:link href="https://vitor.npub.pro/tag/issuecomment-1646858226/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
        <itunes:new-feed-url>https://vitor.npub.pro/tag/issuecomment-1646858226/rss/</itunes:new-feed-url>
        <itunes:author><![CDATA[Vitor Pamplona]]></itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Nostr's Chief Android Officer - #Amethyst]]></itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
        <itunes:owner>
          <itunes:name><![CDATA[Vitor Pamplona]]></itunes:name>
          <itunes:email><![CDATA[Vitor Pamplona]]></itunes:email>
        </itunes:owner>
            
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2023 15:01:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2023 15:01:57 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      
      <itunes:image href="https://vitorpamplona.com/me.jpg" />
      
      <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Isn't this better than SimpleX…]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[Isn't this better than SimpleX Chat's protocol? 


There wouldn't even be a queue to correlate messages on. Each message comes from a different random key.
Send and receive payloads can be separated in time (the receiver sees the DM immediately, but the sender logs the message, or…]]></description>
             <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Isn't this better than SimpleX Chat's protocol? 


There wouldn't even be a queue to correlate messages on. Each message comes from a different random key.
Send and receive payloads can be separated in time (the receiver sees the DM immediately, but the sender logs the message, or…]]></itunes:subtitle>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2023 15:01:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>https://vitor.npub.pro/post/note1gkg6m6u7e3uftxdn7g84zu20h5q9ckecjslerd0wz96ygwnry3ksz244a4/</link>
      <comments>https://vitor.npub.pro/post/note1gkg6m6u7e3uftxdn7g84zu20h5q9ckecjslerd0wz96ygwnry3ksz244a4/</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">note1gkg6m6u7e3uftxdn7g84zu20h5q9ckecjslerd0wz96ygwnry3ksz244a4</guid>
      <category>issuecomment-1646858226</category>
      
      <noteId>note1gkg6m6u7e3uftxdn7g84zu20h5q9ckecjslerd0wz96ygwnry3ksz244a4</noteId>
      <npub>npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z</npub>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Vitor Pamplona]]></dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn't this better than SimpleX Chat's protocol? <br><br>1. There wouldn't even be a queue to correlate messages on. Each message comes from a different random key. <br><br>2. Send and receive payloads can be separated in time (the receiver sees the DM immediately, but the sender logs the message, or better, a group of messages, in the future or the past inside Nostr relays).<br><br>3. As we add more private event kinds, the anonymity set increases. The public won't even know what is a DM and what's not. <br><br>4. Yes, anyone will see that you are receiving "things". But GiftWraps can wrap Noise (events that don't mean anything and should be discarded upon receipt). No one will know what's noise and what's an actual DM. <br><br><np-embed url="https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/468<a href='/tag/issuecomment-1646858226/'>#issuecomment-1646858226</a>"><a href="https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/468<a href='/tag/issuecomment-1646858226/'>#issuecomment-1646858226</a>">https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/468<a href='/tag/issuecomment-1646858226/'>#issuecomment-1646858226</a></a></np-embed></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <itunes:author><![CDATA[Vitor Pamplona]]></itunes:author>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Isn't this better than SimpleX Chat's protocol? <br><br>1. There wouldn't even be a queue to correlate messages on. Each message comes from a different random key. <br><br>2. Send and receive payloads can be separated in time (the receiver sees the DM immediately, but the sender logs the message, or better, a group of messages, in the future or the past inside Nostr relays).<br><br>3. As we add more private event kinds, the anonymity set increases. The public won't even know what is a DM and what's not. <br><br>4. Yes, anyone will see that you are receiving "things". But GiftWraps can wrap Noise (events that don't mean anything and should be discarded upon receipt). No one will know what's noise and what's an actual DM. <br><br><np-embed url="https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/468<a href='/tag/issuecomment-1646858226/'>#issuecomment-1646858226</a>"><a href="https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/468<a href='/tag/issuecomment-1646858226/'>#issuecomment-1646858226</a>">https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/468<a href='/tag/issuecomment-1646858226/'>#issuecomment-1646858226</a></a></np-embed></p>
]]></itunes:summary>
      
      </item>
      
      </channel>
      </rss>
    